menu-close
ChinaSeptember 23 2025, 3:40 am

China AI Persona Army: GoLaxy Papers Expose Information Warfare

A Chi­nese AI per­sona army has been exposed through leaked inter­nal doc­u­ments from a Bei­jing-based com­pa­ny, GoLaxy, reveal­ing sophis­ti­cat­ed infor­ma­tion war­fare tac­tics tar­get­ing Amer­i­can pub­lic fig­ures and cit­i­zens. On 19 Sep­tem­ber 2025, The Record report­ed that researchers dis­cov­ered a cache of 399 pages detail­ing how Chi­na uses arti­fi­cial intel­li­gence to cre­ate real­is­tic dig­i­tal per­sonas designed to infil­trate social media and manip­u­late pub­lic opin­ion. The arti­cle begins:

On a jet-lagged April morn­ing ear­li­er this year, Brett Gold­stein’s phone buzzed with a mes­sage from a trust­ed col­league ask­ing him to check out a link he’d just found. Gold­stein, a for­mer gov­ern­ment tech­nol­o­gist and now a spe­cial advis­er at Van­der­bilt Uni­ver­si­ty’s Insti­tute for Nation­al Secu­ri­ty, was in the mid­dle of a con­fer­ence. Lat­er, back in his hotel room, he scrolled through to the mes­sage again. The note was insis­tent and includ­ed a link. “I hate links,” he said. Still, he was curi­ous, so he scanned the link for mal­ware, ran a few checks, and clicked — and what appeared on his screen was a trove of PDFs all writ­ten in Man­darin. There were pages of dense Man­darin char­ac­ters, some­thing that looked like tech­ni­cal schemat­ics, and then, strange­ly, pho­tos of promi­nent Amer­i­cans. “At first I thought it was spam,” Gold­stein remem­bered. But as he scrolled through the files, he real­ized it was some­thing else: a leak.

Read more: https://therecord.media/golaxy-china-artificial-intelligence-papers

Key Points

  • GoLaxy doc­u­ments revealed dossiers on 2,000 Amer­i­can pub­lic fig­ures and 117 Repub­li­can Con­gress members
  • Chi­nese com­pa­ny employs near­ly 1,000 peo­ple and main­tains ties to mil­i­tary and civil­ian intelligence
  • AI per­sonas use Chi­na’s DeepSeek tech­nol­o­gy to cre­ate high­ly real­is­tic dig­i­tal iden­ti­ties for influ­ence operations
  • GoLaxy began delet­ing web­site con­tent after New York Times con­tact­ed them for comment

China’s Artificial Intelligence Influence Operations: How Beijing Weaponizes AI to Manipulate Global Information

Chi­na has sys­tem­at­i­cal­ly weaponized arti­fi­cial intel­li­gence to rev­o­lu­tion­ize its influ­ence oper­a­tions, deploy­ing sophis­ti­cat­ed AI-pow­ered strate­gies that merge psy­cho­log­i­cal pro­fil­ing, algo­rith­mic tar­get­ing, and mass sur­veil­lance to manip­u­late glob­al infor­ma­tion envi­ron­ments with unprece­dent­ed pre­ci­sion. Chi­na’s mil­i­tary devel­oped “algo­rith­mic cog­ni­tive war­fare” using AI to cre­ate detailed psy­cho­log­i­cal pro­files for tar­get­ed influ­ence oper­a­tions, with PLA schol­ars envi­sion­ing per­son­al­ized con­tent gen­er­a­tion at scale that exploits rec­om­men­da­tion algo­rithms for max­i­mum impact. Chi­nese threat actor Spam­ou­flage Drag­on uses gen­er­a­tive AI to cre­ate con­vinc­ing online per­sonas that influ­ence pub­lic opin­ion across glob­al plat­forms, while Chi­na has devel­oped free advanced AI mod­els like DeepSeek and Qwen that rival West­ern equiv­a­lents despite export restric­tions, mir­ror­ing debt-trap diplo­ma­cy by cre­at­ing tech­no­log­i­cal depen­den­cy among nations unable to afford alternatives.

The oper­a­tional sophis­ti­ca­tion of Chi­nese AI influ­ence cam­paigns has reached alarm­ing lev­els, with Bei­jing deploy­ing these capa­bil­i­ties for com­pre­hen­sive sur­veil­lance and dis­in­for­ma­tion oper­a­tions tar­get­ing demo­c­ra­t­ic soci­eties world­wide. Ope­nAI banned mul­ti­ple accounts for using Chat­G­PT to devel­op the “Qianyue Over­seas Pub­lic Opin­ion AI Assis­tant,” designed to mon­i­tor anti-Chi­na protests glob­al­ly and col­lect real-time data from X, Face­book, YouTube, Insta­gram, Telegram, and Red­dit for shar­ing with Chi­nese authorities.

Stan­ford research con­firms that Chi­nese insti­tu­tions are rapid­ly clos­ing the AI qual­i­ty gap, with Chi­nese AI mod­els reach­ing near par­i­ty on key bench­marks after trail­ing US mod­els by dou­ble-dig­it per­cent­ages just one year ear­li­er, while Chi­nese-ori­gin clus­ters used AI-gen­er­at­ed pro­file pho­tos to tar­get Myan­mar, Tai­wan, and Japan with con­tent sup­port­ing mil­i­tary jun­tas and crit­i­ciz­ing gov­ern­ment ties with the Unit­ed States.

The scope and scale of Chi­nese AI-enabled influ­ence oper­a­tions demon­strate a coor­di­nat­ed state strat­e­gy to under­mine demo­c­ra­t­ic dis­course and expand author­i­tar­i­an influ­ence through tech­no­log­i­cal supe­ri­or­i­ty. Chi­nese oper­a­tives have lever­aged AI tools not only for con­tent cre­ation but also for oper­a­tional effi­cien­cy, with Chi­na’s 22 mil­lion-strong inter­net troll army now enhanced by arti­fi­cial intel­li­gence capa­bil­i­ties that enable auto­mat­ed con­tent gen­er­a­tion and coor­di­nat­ed ampli­fi­ca­tion across platforms.

The Diplo­mat analy­sis reveals that Chi­nese AI-dri­ven oper­a­tions have evolved beyond sim­ple pro­pa­gan­da to sophis­ti­cat­ed mul­ti-lay­ered cam­paigns, includ­ing fake French news sites tar­get­ing fran­coph­o­ne youth and lever­ag­ing gen­er­a­tive AI to tai­lor con­tent to local lan­guages and cul­tur­al con­texts. Ope­nAI inves­ti­ga­tors con­firm this rep­re­sents “a grow­ing range of covert oper­a­tions using a grow­ing range of tac­tics,” with Chi­nese actors com­bin­ing tra­di­tion­al influ­ence tech­niques with cut­ting-edge AI capa­bil­i­ties to cre­ate false impres­sions of organ­ic engage­ment and manip­u­late pub­lic dis­course at unprece­dent­ed scale.

Exter­nal References:

Dis­claimer

The Glob­al Influ­ence Oper­a­tions Report (GIOR) employs AI through­out the post­ing process, includ­ing gen­er­at­ing sum­maries of news items, the intro­duc­tion, key points, and often the “con­text” sec­tion. We rec­om­mend ver­i­fy­ing all infor­ma­tion before use. Addi­tion­al­ly, images are AI-gen­er­at­ed and intend­ed sole­ly for illus­tra­tive pur­pos­es. While they rep­re­sent the events or indi­vid­u­als dis­cussed, they should not be inter­pret­ed as real-world photography.