Concerns over Chinese election interference in the Philippines have reached a governmental level ahead of the crucial vote. On May 2, 2025, The Diplomat reported that Philippine authorities have publicly accused China of meddling in the upcoming midterm elections, with intelligence agencies warning that Beijing-affiliated entities are actively working to influence the May 12 vote through covert online operations. The article begins:
Philippine authorities have flagged the alleged meddling of China in the ongoing campaign for the midterm local and national elections scheduled for May 12. China has denied the accusation, but the specter of foreign interference has become an election narrative that could influence not just the results but also the long-term prospects of political forces suspected of promoting anti-Filipino interests. During a Senate hearing, reelectionist Senator Francis Tolentino exposed the role of the Chinese embassy in hiring “keyboard warriors” to promote an agenda that runs counter to Manila’s claims in the West Philippine Sea, as it refers to its portion of the South China Sea.
Read more: https://thediplomat.com/2025/05/philippine-authorities-call-out-alleged-chinese-election-interference/
Key Points
- The National Security Council confirmed evidence of Chinese state-sponsored information operations actively interfering in the upcoming elections.
- Senator Hontiveros urged passage of the Foreign Interference Act, calling the situation a serious threat to electoral integrity.
- Chinese Embassy spokesperson denied allegations, accusing Filipino politicians of playing the “China card” for political gain.
- Investigators linked “fake news” accounts promoting sympathy for former President Duterte to China-backed disinformation networks.
Chinese Election Interference: Tactics, Targets, and Global Reach
Chinese election interference has evolved into a global challenge, marked by a diverse toolkit that includes digital disinformation, covert funding, and the manipulation of diaspora networks. In Canada, authorities have uncovered coordinated efforts to sway federal elections and target political leaders via WeChat-based influence campaigns, while the United States has responded to Meta dismantling extensive China-based networks and Twitter removing coordinated operations that amplified polarizing narratives and eroded public trust. Intelligence findings have confirmed increased foreign interference during recent US midterms, with Chinese actors using fake accounts, AI-generated content, and clandestine funding to obscure the origins of propaganda. These activities are not limited to North America; similar tactics have targeted elections in Taiwan and Australia, where cyber-enabled disinformation, economic pressure, and the mobilization of community organizations have become central strategies. China’s approach increasingly mirrors the disruptive techniques pioneered by other authoritarian regimes, including the spread of conspiracy theories and destabilization of information environments. Across Europe, authorities warn that such operations are rapidly adapting to new technologies and countermeasures, while recent surveys in Hungary show growing public support for closer ties with China among ruling party voters, reflecting Beijing’s success in leveraging economic incentives and information campaigns to shape local attitudes. This global pattern of interference continues to test the resilience of democratic institutions and highlights the urgent need for coordinated countermeasures.
External References:
-
China now seen as influencing politics more than ever, on a global scale
-
Foreign meddling a ‘stain’ on Canada’s elections, public inquiry finds
-
Chinese election interference tests Taiwan’s capability to defend freedom of speech
Disclaimer
The Global Influence Operations Report (GIOR) employs AI throughout the posting process, including generating summaries of news items, the introduction, key points, and often the “context” section. We recommend verifying all information before use. Additionally, images are AI-generated and intended solely for illustrative purposes. While they represent the events or individuals discussed, they should not be interpreted as real-world photography.