European far-right politicians traveled to Florida to meet with leaders of a prominent US climate denial organization, raising concerns about coordinated attacks on EU environmental policies. On 19 September 2025, DeSmog revealed that Austrian Freedom Party MEP Harald Vilimsky and German AfD politician Markus Buchheit met with Heartland Institute president James Taylor in Tampa, Florida, in July to discuss strategies for countering EU climate legislation. The article begins:
Members of the European Parliament flew 5,000 miles to Florida this summer to meet with the head of a U.S. climate denial group, DeSmog can reveal. Freedom Party of Austria’s Harald Vilimsky and Alternative for Germany (AfD) MEP Markus Buchheit, vocal critics of EU climate policy in their respective far-right parties, met with James Taylor, the president of the Heartland Institute, one day apart in July in Tampa, Florida. It comes after DeSmog and The Guardian revealed in January how Heartland, which has for decades been at the forefront of denying the scientific evidence for man made climate change, had attempted to scupper major EU climate reforms by forging alliances with far-right politicians. The lobby group, which has received funding from U.S. oil giant ExxonMobil, calls itself “the leading global think tank countering climate alarmism”.
Key Points
- Austrian FPÖ’s Harald Vilimsky has now held eight meetings with Heartland Institute since 2019.
- The Heartland Institute has received funding from ExxonMobil and backs Trump’s withdrawal from the Paris climate agreement.
- Meetings occurred during record-breaking heat in Tampa, where temperatures reached 100°F for the first time since 1890.
- Austrian Green MEP calls the collaboration “a scandal” and a threat to European climate goals.
The Freedom Party (FPÖ) of Austria and the Alternative for Germany (AfD) are the key representatives of the Global National Conservative Alliance (GNCA) in their respective countries.
The Global National Conservative Alliance (GNCA) and Climate: Obstructionism, Denialism, and Diversion
The Global National Conservative Alliance (GNCA) has systematically weaponized climate policy as a sovereignty battleground, with parties treating EU Green Deal and Paris targets as outside impositions rather than shared obligations. National conservative movements across multiple continents consistently reframe climate action as threats to jobs, farmers, and national identity while promising to renegotiate or slow regulations they characterize as punitive foreign interference. The Heritage Foundation’s coordination of this strategy represents active support for far-right parties in framing climate action as globalist tyranny, while simultaneously orchestrating what it calls “nationalist internationalism” to counter environmental cooperation frameworks through coordinated resistance across borders.
The alliance’s climate obstruction operates through systematic funding networks that connect fossil fuel interests with broader culture war strategies, as evidenced by 80% of anti-transgender organizations receiving financial support from oil and gas companies or their wealthy owners. Major fossil fuel entities, including Shell USA Company Foundation and billionaire Phil Anschutz, have donated significant sums to groups like Alliance Defending Freedom, illustrating how fossil fuel billionaires fund anti-trans movements to divert attention from climate change risks while upholding traditional social structures that support fossil fuel-dependent economic models. This intersectional approach shows how climate denial and social conservatism share both funding sources and strategic objectives within the broader alliance framework.
The coordinated approach creates a drag coalition that seldom tears up climate goals but consistently slows their execution, with each delay — whether five-year coal reprieves in Poland, stalled auto-emissions rules in France, or expanded U.S. drilling leases — ratcheting global CO₂ levels higher and squeezing the remaining carbon budget for effective climate action. The systematic nature of this obstruction extends beyond individual policies to coordinated messaging that positions fossil fuel extraction as patriotic while characterizing environmental protection as foreign interference, creating economic incentives that raise financing costs for renewables while directing subsidies toward fossil fuel security across multiple allied nations simultaneously.
External References:
• The Far Right Has a ‘Battle Plan’ to Undo Climate Progress Should Trump Win in 2024
• Far-right win in France could deal blow to climate policy
• Fossil fuel billionaires are bankrolling the anti-trans movement
Disclaimer
The Global Influence Operations Report (GIOR) employs AI throughout the posting process, including generating summaries of news items, the introduction, key points, and often the “context” section. We recommend verifying all information before use. Additionally, images are AI-generated and intended solely for illustrative purposes. While they represent the events or individuals discussed, they should not be interpreted as real-world photography.