Germany AfD extremist label has created a constitutional crisis in Europe’s largest democracy. On May 13, 2025, The Atlantic published an analysis examining how Germany’s domestic intelligence agency labeled the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) party an “extremist” organization despite its holding nearly a quarter of seats in parliament, raising profound questions about democratic governance and political opposition. The article begins:
In the year leading up to Germany’s February elections, the far-right party Alternative for Germany was rising fast in the polls. It would ultimately increase its seats in the Bundestag from 76 to 152. But when I talked with supporters, I found that they were cynical. One of the most consistent messages I heard when I visited Germany was that the government had rigged the game against them. “It’s not just the opposing parties that don’t want us; the system itself doesn’t want us,” said a member of the crowd at a rally in Thuringia. Now that claim seems undeniable. Last week, the German domestic spy agency Bundesamt für Verfassungsschutz declared the AfD an “extremist” organization, which makes it eligible for surveillance, infiltration, and a potential outright ban.
Read more: https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2025/05/afd-germany-extremism-ban/675901/
Key Points
- The intelligence agency’s classification allows for surveillance of a party holding 152 parliamentary seats, creating unprecedented democratic tensions.
- Former intelligence chief Hans-Georg Maassen criticized the practice, stating Germany and Austria are “the only countries in the Western world who use a domestic intelligence service to observe political opponents.”
- The agency cited AfD’s “understanding of the nation that is racist” and views “hostile to foreigners and Muslims” as justification for the extremist label.
- Under German law, a party can only be banned if it’s strong enough to threaten democracy—creating a paradox where the AfD may be “too big to ban, and too big not to.”
AfD and the Global National Conservative Alliance
The Alternative for Germany (AfD) has become a linchpin in the Global National Conservative Alliance, with its designation as an extremist party in Germany drawing international attention and fueling debates about the normalization of far-right politics across Europe. The AfD’s deepening ties with Hungary’s Fidesz party and its participation in transnational far-right events in the UK underscore the operational and ideological connections uniting nationalist movements. This network is further strengthened by Russia’s targeted influence campaigns that amplify anti-EU and anti-immigration narratives, a trend confirmed by investigative reporting from The New York Times, which details how Russian actors have cultivated relationships with AfD politicians to undermine support for Ukraine and destabilize German democracy.
The Soufan Center has documented how these influence operations use disinformation, financial incentives, and political alliances to empower parties like the AfD, especially ahead of key elections. While the AfD often expresses admiration for Vladimir Putin, analyses reveal stark contradictions between the party’s stated values and the realities of Russian authoritarianism. As the AfD’s influence grows, BBC reporting notes that its rise is part of a continent-wide surge in far-right movements, fueled by economic uncertainty, anti-immigrant sentiment, and coordinated international support. The AfD’s ability to participate in high-profile far-right events and its role as a conduit for Russian-backed disinformation highlight the party’s transformation from a national protest movement into a key node within a transnational alliance that challenges liberal democratic norms across Europe.
External References:
-
IntelBrief: Russian Interference Tactics in European Democratic Processes Ramp Up
-
Far right looks for election breakthrough as Germany falters — BBC
Disclaimer
The Global Influence Operations Report (GIOR) employs AI throughout the posting process, including generating summaries of news items, the introduction, key points, and often the “context” section. We recommend verifying all information before use. Additionally, images are AI-generated and intended solely for illustrative purposes. While they represent the events or individuals discussed, they should not be interpreted as real-world photography.