The Heritage Foundation Project Esther antisemitism initiative is rapidly unraveling as Jewish organizations resign en masse following the conservative think tank’s defense of Tucker Carlson. On 3 November 2025, the Jewish Telegraphic Agency reported that at least eight individuals and organizations affiliated with Heritage’s National Task Force to Combat Antisemitism have resigned or threatened to do so after president Kevin Roberts defended Carlson’s friendly interview with white nationalist Nick Fuentes and described critics as a venomous coalition. The article begins:
The Heritage Foundation’s marquee effort to combat antisemitism, a coalition known as Project Esther, is rapidly losing members following the conservative think tank’s public defense of Tucker Carlson after he gave a friendly interview to the white nationalist and antisemitic provocateur Nick Fuentes. At least eight individuals and organizations affiliated with Heritage’s National Task Force to Combat Antisemitism, launched last year under the Project Esther banner, have resigned or threatened to do so, citing Heritage president Kevin Roberts’ decision to stand by Carlson and his description of the television personality’s critics as a “venomous coalition.” The defections suggest that Project Esther — unveiled on the first anniversary of the Oct. 7 Hamas attack as a conservative “national strategy to counter antisemitism”— could be imploding. Neither the co-chairs of the initiative nor the Heritage Foundation immediately responded to a request for comment about the resignations.
Key Points
- At least eight individuals and organizations resigned from Heritage’s antisemitism task force, including Rabbi Mark Goldfeder, David Bernstein, the Deborah Project, Young Jewish Conservatives, and the Israel Forever Foundation.
- Heritage president Kevin Roberts initially defended Carlson and described his critics as a venomous coalition, though he later apologized at Hillsdale College calling his video a mistake made with the best of intentions.
- Project Esther was conceived as a counterweight to the Biden administration’s antisemitism strategy and focused almost entirely on left-wing activism while downplaying antisemitism on the political right from the outset.
- Multiple groups Heritage named as participants at Project Esther’s launch, including Christians United for Israel, the Hudson Institute, the Atlantic Council, and the Republican Jewish Coalition, denied any involvement in the initiative.
Heritage Foundation Drives MAGA Movement Through Project 2025 Blueprint
The Heritage Foundation has undergone a dramatic transformation from its Reagan-era roots into the institutional backbone of the US MAGA movement. Under president Kevin Roberts, who explicitly describes his role as “institutionalizing Trumpism,” the organization shifted from traditional free-market conservatism to embrace national conservatism, immigration restriction, and expanded executive power. This transformation culminated in Project 2025, a sprawling 900-page blueprint launched in 2022 that outlines plans to dismantle civil liberties, gut civil service protections, and impose Christian nationalist policies across federal agencies.
Project 2025 represents Heritage’s most ambitious institutional power grab, featuring personnel databases vetting loyalists, training modules for appointees, and specific policies consolidating executive authority. Despite Trump’s campaign attempts to distance himself from the initiative, analysis found nearly two-thirds of Trump’s executive actions in his second term mirror Project 2025 proposals. At least 140 people who worked in Trump’s first administration contributed to the project, with several architects now appointed to senior government positions including Russ Vought as director of the Office of Management and Budget. CNN analysis revealed that 36 of 53 executive orders Trump signed in his first week as president mirrored Heritage Foundation proposals, demonstrating the blueprint’s direct implementation.
Beyond domestic restructuring, Heritage has positioned itself as architect of what it calls a global “nationalist internationalism.” In June 2025, Heritage released a report calling for Trump to establish a global alliance of conservative, nationalist, and populist movements to counter transnational left institutions. This alliance includes strategic partnerships with Hungarian autocrat Viktor Orbán’s government-backed Mathias Corvinus Collegium and Poland’s illiberal Ordo Iuris. Following Project 2025’s implementation, Heritage convened a March 2025 closed-door workshop featuring proposals to dismantle the European Commission and European Court of Justice, with Roberts explicitly calling for Europeans to “reclaim sovereignty” from Brussels.
The MAGA movement itself has become increasingly fractured over ideological direction and foreign policy, particularly regarding Israel and international engagement. In May 2025, prominent anti-woke pundit James Lindsay attacked religious and nationalist conservatives as the “woke right,” while national conservative leader Yoram Hazony warned these attacks threatened coalition unity. The American Civil Liberties Union warns that Project 2025 threatens to erode democracy through radical executive branch restructuring serving a conservative agenda, while The Nation notes Heritage aims to “recruit, train and plant MAGA operatives throughout the government” with the priority to “bring the permanent bureaucracy to heel.”
External References:
— Trump claims not to know who is behind Project 2025. A CNN review found at least 140 people who worked for him are involved
— Project 2025, Explained | American Civil Liberties Union
— Will the Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025 Turn Trumpism Into a Governing Agenda? | The Nation
Disclaimer: The Global Influence Operations Report (GIOR) utilizes AI throughout the posting process, including the generation of summaries for news items, introductions, key points, and, often, the “context” section. We recommend verifying all information before use. Additionally, all images are generated using AI and are intended solely for illustrative purposes. While they represent the events or individuals discussed, they should not be interpreted as real-world photography.