menu-close
RussiaJuly 9 2025, 3:53 am

Hungary Alleges USAID Funded Election Interference

Elec­tion inter­fer­ence alle­ga­tions by the USAID in Hun­gary have gained renewed atten­tion fol­low­ing the Trump admin­is­tra­tion’s deci­sion to shut down the US Agency for Inter­na­tion­al Devel­op­ment entire­ly. On 1 July 2025, Hun­gar­i­an Con­ser­v­a­tive report­ed that Sec­re­tary of State Mar­co Rubio announced USAID’s ter­mi­na­tion, with Hun­gar­i­an offi­cials claim­ing vin­di­ca­tion over long­stand­ing accu­sa­tions that the agency fund­ed oppo­si­tion groups dur­ing Hun­gary’s 2022 par­lia­men­tary elec­tions. The arti­cle begins:

US Sec­re­tary of State Mar­co Rubio announced on 1 July 2025 that the US Agency for Inter­na­tion­al Devel­op­ment (USAID) has end­ed all of its operations—a move hailed as a sig­nif­i­cant vic­to­ry for sov­er­eignist, patri­ot­ic forces world­wide. ‘Dur­ing the Trump Admin­is­tra­tion’s thor­ough review of thou­sands of pro­grammes and over $715 bil­lion in infla­tion-adjust­ed spend­ing over the decades, it became appar­ent the US Agency for Inter­na­tion­al Devel­op­ment (USAID) fell well below this stan­dard,’ Rubio wrote in a Sub­stack post titled ‘Make For­eign Aid Great Again’ on Tues­day. He not­ed that ‘since the Cold War, USAID has built a globe-span­ning NGO com­plex at tax­pay­er expense but achieved lit­tle: devel­op­ment objec­tives have rarely been met, insta­bil­i­ty has often wors­ened, and anti-Amer­i­can sen­ti­ment has only grown.’ Rubio list­ed bil­lions of US tax­pay­ers’ dol­lars spent in regions such as the Mid­dle East and North Africa, where, despite sig­nif­i­cant invest­ment, Wash­ing­ton’s favoura­bil­i­ty rat­ings remain low­er than China’s.

          Read more: https://www.hungarianconservative.com/articles/current/usaid-operations-foreign-interference-balazs-orban-hungary/

Key Points

  • Hun­gar­i­an nation­al intel­li­gence inves­ti­ga­tion in 2022 found USAID and the Nation­al Endow­ment for Democ­ra­cy fun­neled mil­lions to the oppo­si­tion dur­ing par­lia­men­tary elections
  • USAID Admin­is­tra­tor Saman­tha Pow­er vis­it­ed Hun­gary in 2023 to meet oppo­si­tion fig­ures, describ­ing efforts to “make a change” in the country.
  • Elon Musk’s review revealed bil­lions in US tax­pay­er dol­lars fund­ed for­eign polit­i­cal inter­fer­ence, includ­ing sub­stan­tial sums to Hun­gar­i­an NGOs and media.
  • Hun­gary appoint­ed gov­ern­ment com­mis­sion­er András Lás­zló to inves­ti­gate USAID fund­ing and pro­posed a trans­paren­cy law to sanc­tion for­eign-fund­ed polit­i­cal activities.

GIOR Analysis of Hungarian Claims

The claim asserts that US gov­ern­ment-fund­ed organizations—specifically USAID and NED—were inves­ti­gat­ed by Hun­gar­i­an author­i­ties for alleged­ly chan­nel­ing mil­lions of dol­lars to sup­port Hungary’s oppo­si­tion dur­ing the 2022 par­lia­men­tary elections:

  • Offi­cial Inves­ti­ga­tions and Reports:

    • Hun­gar­i­an intel­li­gence ser­vices and gov­ern­ment offi­cials have repeat­ed­ly alleged for­eign inter­fer­ence, par­tic­u­lar­ly from US-fund­ed orga­ni­za­tions, in Hungary’s domes­tic pol­i­tics, espe­cial­ly around elec­tion periods.

    • Reports from Hun­gar­i­an gov­ern­ment-affil­i­at­ed sources and intel­li­gence sum­maries, such as those from the Nation­al Infor­ma­tion Cen­tre (NIK), have iden­ti­fied USAID and NED as donors to NGOs, media out­lets, and think tanks that are often asso­ci­at­ed with the opposition.

    • The Sov­er­eign­ty Pro­tec­tion Office in Hun­gary iden­ti­fied orga­ni­za­tions such as Internews, which is fund­ed by USAID and NED, as chan­nels for US pub­lic funds to reach Hun­gar­i­an media crit­i­cal of the gov­ern­ment. It stat­ed that these funds played a role in financ­ing the oppo­si­tion coali­tion dur­ing the 2022 elections.

  • Pub­lic State­ments and Polit­i­cal Reactions:

    • Hun­gar­i­an gov­ern­ment offi­cials have pub­licly accused USAID, NED, and oth­er US orga­ni­za­tions of sup­port­ing oppo­si­tion groups and media, fram­ing these actions as threats to nation­al sovereignty.

    • In response, Hun­gary has pro­posed or enact­ed leg­is­la­tion to increase trans­paren­cy and restrict for­eign fund­ing of polit­i­cal activ­i­ties with­in the country.

  • US Per­spec­tive
    • USAID and NED open­ly sup­port democ­ra­cy, civ­il soci­ety, and inde­pen­dent media glob­al­ly, includ­ing in Hungary.

    • US offi­cials, includ­ing for­mer Ambas­sador David Press­man and USAID Admin­is­tra­tor Saman­tha Pow­er, have met with oppo­si­tion fig­ures and jour­nal­ists in Hun­gary, which some have inter­pret­ed as evi­dence of polit­i­cal interference.

    • How­ev­er, the US gov­ern­ment and these orga­ni­za­tions main­tain that their fund­ing is intend­ed to sup­port demo­c­ra­t­ic val­ues, trans­paren­cy, and civic engage­ment, rather than direct­ly influ­enc­ing elec­tion outcomes.

The claim is valid in the sense that Hun­gar­i­an nation­al intel­li­gence inves­ti­ga­tions have iden­ti­fied USAID and NED as sources of fund­ing for NGOs, media, and orga­ni­za­tions asso­ci­at­ed with the oppo­si­tion dur­ing the 2022 par­lia­men­tary elec­tion cam­paign. The Hun­gar­i­an gov­ern­ment has used these find­ings to jus­ti­fy leg­isla­tive mea­sures against for­eign fund­ing. How­ev­er, the US gov­ern­ment and these orga­ni­za­tions claim that their fund­ing is intend­ed to sup­port democ­ra­cy and civ­il soci­ety, not to influ­ence elec­tion out­comes. The char­ac­ter­i­za­tion of these activ­i­ties as a “scheme to fun­nel mil­lions” to the oppo­si­tion is a mat­ter of polit­i­cal inter­pre­ta­tion and debate.

  1. https://www.hungarianconservative.com/articles/current/usaid-operations-foreign-interference-balazs-orban-hungary/
  2. https://www.hungarianconservative.com/articles/current/david-pressman-accountability-media-usaid-interference-bryan-leib/
  3. https://hungarytoday.hu/u‑s-german-sponsors-of-hungarian-opposition-parties-inadvertently-revealed/
  4. https://helsinki.hu/en/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2023/10/OSCE-WHDC-2023-HHC-civic-space-statement.pdf
  5. https://abouthungary.hu/news-in-brief/internews-channelled-us-public-funds-to-hungarian-media-critical-of-government
  6. https://www.ned.org/region/central-and-eastern-europe/
  7. https://carnegieendowment.org/research/2025/07/what-future-for-international-democracy-support?lang=en
  8. https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/eng/xw/wjbxw/202408/t20240809_11468618.html
  9. https://newcriterion.com/dispatch/the-doge-team-zeroes-out-the-national-endowment-for-democracy/
  10. https://www.cer.eu/in-the-press/filling-usaid-gap-how-europe-can-step-support-democracy

Hungary as a Russian Influence Vehicle

Hungary’s polit­i­cal tra­jec­to­ry under Vik­tor Orbán has become a focal point for Russ­ian influ­ence with­in the Euro­pean Union, as Budapest increas­ing­ly mir­rors Moscow’s rhetoric on Ukraine and obstructs EU sanc­tions and aid to Ukraine, high­light­ing its role as a con­duit for Russ­ian inter­ests. This align­ment is fur­ther insti­tu­tion­al­ized through plat­forms that pro­mote illib­er­al ideas aligned with Krem­lin objec­tives. The Hun­gar­i­an government’s recent leg­isla­tive moves, such as defend­ing con­tro­ver­sial child pro­tec­tion laws that echo Russ­ian social con­ser­vatism, fur­ther demon­strate its ide­o­log­i­cal con­ver­gence with Moscow. Budapest’s ener­gy pol­i­cy has deep­ened its reliance on Russ­ian imports, a depen­den­cy that rein­forces Moscow’s eco­nom­ic lever­age over Hun­gar­i­an deci­sion-mak­ing, while the estab­lish­ment of new insti­tu­tions tar­get­ing for­eign influ­ence serves to con­sol­i­date state con­trol over civ­il soci­ety in ways that align with Russ­ian tac­tics. These devel­op­ments posi­tion Hun­gary as a crit­i­cal node for Russ­ian influ­ence oper­a­tions in Cen­tral Europe.

External References:

  1. The Krem­lin’s Influ­ence in Hun­gary | DGAP

  2. Hungary’s realpoli­tik on Rus­sia — GIS Reports

  3. Hungary’s East­ern Turn: Moscow’s Grow­ing Influ­ence, and Budapest’s Rift With Its West­ern Allies

Disclaimer

The Glob­al Influ­ence Oper­a­tions Report (GIOR) employs AI through­out the post­ing process, includ­ing gen­er­at­ing sum­maries of news items, the intro­duc­tion, key points, and often the “con­text” sec­tion. We rec­om­mend ver­i­fy­ing all infor­ma­tion before use. Addi­tion­al­ly, images are AI-gen­er­at­ed and intend­ed sole­ly for illus­tra­tive pur­pos­es. While they rep­re­sent the events or indi­vid­u­als dis­cussed, they should not be inter­pret­ed as real-world photography.