A dispute between Tucker Carlson and Mark Levin over the Iran war has exposed deep divisions within conservative media over Trump’s foreign policy direction. On June 6, 2025, Responsible Statecraft reported that Carlson launched a scathing attack on Levin after the talk show host visited the White House to lobby for military action against Iran, with Carlson denouncing neoconservative claims about Iran’s nuclear program as fabricated justifications for regime change war. The article begins:
Five months into President Donald Trump’s second term, spring is looking like winter for the neoconservatives. This might be best gauged right now looking at the back and forth war between conservative media giants, Tucker Carlson and Mark Levin. When Trump’s special envoy to the Middle East Steve Witkoff said in an interview in May that, “the neocon element believes that war is the only way to solve things,” Levin took offense.
Read more: https://responsiblestatecraft.org/tucker-carlson/
Key Points
- Carlson accused Levin of having “no plans to fight in this or any other war” while demanding American troops attack Iran based on fabricated nuclear weapons claims.
- The dispute began when Levin called Trump envoy Steve Witkoff an anti-Semite for criticizing neoconservatives, despite Witkoff himself being Jewish, according to Carlson.
- Carlson’s X post attacking Levin’s war advocacy received over 5.4 million views and support from Congressman Ro Khanna and former Representative Matt Gaetz.
- Quincy Institute’s Trita Parsi praised Carlson for addressing the “deal-killing demand” of zero uranium enrichment that neoconservatives use to prevent diplomatic solutions.
Tucker Carlson, MAGA, and the Iran War: How GNCA Tensions Shape U.S. Policy
Tucker Carlson has become a pivotal figure in the ideological and operational dynamics linking the MAGA movement, the Global National Conservative Alliance (GNCA), and the current U.S. debate over war with Iran. His recent interview with Ukrainian-Russian oligarch Vadim Novinsky exemplifies how Western conservative influencers are leveraged to launder Kremlin narratives through religious and nationalist rhetoric, a tactic that aligns with the GNCA’s broader rejection of liberal democracy and support for authoritarian models. At events such as CPAC Hungary 2023, Carlson’s praise of leaders like Viktor Orbán and his amplification of anti-globalist messaging have reinforced transatlantic ties between U.S. and European far-right movements, which Russia seeks to steer as part of its information warfare strategy.
Within the MAGA coalition, Carlson’s outspoken opposition to U.S. military involvement in the Iran-Israel conflict has exposed deep fractures, as he and allies like Steve Bannon publicly challenge Trump’s foreign policy, warning that escalation could “end Trump’s presidency” and undermine the “America First” agenda. This rift is further highlighted by Carlson’s criticism of Trump’s support for Israeli military actions, which he frames as a betrayal of the movement’s isolationist roots and a capitulation to “warmongers” within the conservative establishment. External reporting confirms that Russian state media has systematically amplified Carlson’s critiques of U.S. foreign policy, viewing him as a valuable conduit for undermining Western unity and legitimizing Moscow’s worldview.
Meanwhile, the GNCA’s operational ambitions, as seen in Russia’s attempts to gain leadership, remain entangled with these ideological battles, as American and European nationalists debate the future direction of the movement amid escalating global crises.
External References:
-
Tucker Carlson and Steve Bannon Lead MAGA Resistance to Iran War
-
MAGA infighting over Iran conflict plunges Trump’s movement into disarray
Disclaimer
The Global Influence Operations Report (GIOR) employs AI throughout the posting process, including generating summaries of news items, the introduction, key points, and often the “context” section. We recommend verifying all information before use. Additionally, images are AI-generated and intended solely for illustrative purposes. While they represent the events or individuals discussed, they should not be interpreted as real-world photography.