US National Intelligence chief Tulsi Gabbard has claimed the Obama administration undermined Donald Trump in 2016 through a “treasonous conspiracy,” according to a new intelligence report that attempts to discredit the assessment that Russia favored Donald Trump’s election in 2016. On 18 July 2025, The New York Times reported that Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard released findings suggesting Obama officials forced the intelligence community to alter conclusions about Russian election interference, drawing strong Democratic criticism as politically motivated and error-ridden. The article begins:
The Office of the Director of National Intelligence on Friday issued the latest in a series of reports from the Trump administration attempting to undermine the eight-year-old assessment that Russia favored the election of Donald J. Trump in 2016. Tulsi Gabbard, the director of national intelligence, said the information she was releasing showed a “treasonous conspiracy in 2016” by top Obama administration officials to harm Mr. Trump. Democrats denounced the effort as politically motivated, error-ridden and in contradiction with previous reviews of the assessment. Representative Jim Himes of Connecticut, the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, called Ms. Gabbard’s accusation of treason “baseless.”
Read more: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/18/us/politics/gabbard-obama-trump-russia.html [paywall]
For a similar story, https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jul/18/tulsi-gabbard-obama-2016-election-russia
Key Points
- Multiple reviews, including a Republican-led Senate report, backed intelligence findings that Russia tried to influence the 2016 election by damaging Clinton’s campaign and bolstering Trump
- The new report conflates Russian hacking attempts on election systems with influence operations, suggesting the Obama administration forced the intelligence community to alter conclusions
- Senator Mark Warner criticized Gabbard for “cooking the books” by comparing different Russian activities — unsuccessful infrastructure hacking versus successful influence operations
- The CIA recently referred former director John Brennan to the FBI fora criminal investigation over the speed of the 2016 assessment’s production
Tulsi Gabbard’s Role in the Global National Conservative Alliance
Tulsi Gabbard’s political transformation from Democratic presidential candidate to Trump’s Director of National Intelligence exemplifies the operational dynamics of the Global National Conservative Alliance (GNCA), where opposition to “woke gender ideology” serves as a unifying ideological framework linking American MAGA figures, European far-right leaders, and Russian strategic interests. Her departure from the Democratic Party, citing “cowardly wokeness” and “anti-white racism,” aligned her with the broader anti-progressive movement that Russian state media has enthusiastically embraced, positioning her as what critics describe as a “darling of Russian propagandists and the American far-right.”
Gabbard’s evolution reflects the GNCA’s core strategy of weaponizing cultural grievances against progressive identity politics to build transnational conservative solidarity, with her pro-Russian positions on Ukraine and Syria serving as litmus tests for the alliance’s broader rejection of liberal internationalism. Her controversial stances include echoing Russian talking points about U.S. biological weapons laboratories in Ukraine and blaming NATO expansion for provoking Russia’s invasion, positions that align with broader authoritarian narratives about Western decadence and moral decay.
Her role now overseeing U.S. intelligence operations while maintaining these ideological positions demonstrates how the GNCA has successfully infiltrated key institutional positions, leveraging shared opposition to multiculturalism and progressive social policies to advance geopolitical objectives that have consistently favored Russian strategic interests over traditional American foreign policy commitments.
External References:
Disclaimer
The Global Influence Operations Report (GIOR) employs AI throughout the posting process, including generating summaries of news items, the introduction, key points, and often the “context” section. We recommend verifying all information before use. Additionally, images are AI-generated and intended solely for illustrative purposes. While they represent the events or individuals discussed, they should not be interpreted as real-world photography.