US intelligence indicates contrasting regional trends as Moscow’s influence operations yield mixed results across the South Caucasus. On 28 May 2025, JAMnews reported that the US Defense Intelligence Agency’s annual threat assessment found Russia making progress in bringing Georgia back into its sphere of influence while simultaneously losing ground in Armenia. The report highlights how the ruling Georgian Dream party created favorable conditions for Russian influence following the October 2024 parliamentary elections.
The article begins:
Moscow is almost certainly seeking to bring Georgia back into its sphere of influence and has already made progress through internal political developments in the country, according to the annual report of the US Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), presented to Congress. According to DIA analysts, following the parliamentary elections of October 2024, the ruling Georgian Dream party created favourable conditions for the growth of Russian influence. This conclusion comes against the backdrop of ongoing mass protests in Tbilisi and accusations that the country is drifting away from its path toward European integration. Notably, the report makes almost no mention of Azerbaijan, while Armenia features prominently as an example of deteriorating ties with Moscow. According to the DIA, Russian-Armenian relations “worsened over the past year,” particularly after Armenia announced its potential withdrawal from the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO), prompting Russia to launch an information campaign against Armenia’s democratic path and pro-Western leadership.
Key Points
- US Defense Intelligence Agency identifies Georgia as experiencing “soft annexation of influence” following Georgian Dream party’s electoral victory in October 2024
- Russian-Armenian relations deteriorated significantly after Armenia announced potential withdrawal from the Collective Security Treaty Organization, triggering Moscow’s information campaign response
- The intelligence report notably omits detailed analysis of Azerbaijan, suggesting either regional stability or lack of transparency in current developments
- US Secretary of State Marco Rubio previously labeled the Georgian Dream-led government an “anti-American force” and threatened action against the ruling party
Georgia & Armenia: Russian Influence Operations and Regional Power Dynamics
Russian influence in Georgia is characterized by a combination of digital propaganda, election interference, and strategic political alliances, notably through the Georgian Dream party’s alignment with Moscow, which has facilitated Kremlin efforts to undermine Western institutions and democratic processes. The 2024 parliamentary elections in Georgia were notably affected by Russian election interference tactics, involving coordinated disinformation campaigns and attempts to destabilize pro-Western political forces.
While Georgia experiences significant Russian pressure through political and informational means, Armenia faces a different set of challenges, with Moscow exerting influence primarily via military, geopolitical, and cultural leverage, especially as Armenia’s government pursues closer ties with the European Union and the United States. The complex interplay between these countries is further complicated by Georgia’s role in regional dynamics, where its political decisions sometimes align with Russian interests, indirectly affecting Armenia’s position in the South Caucasus.
US intelligence highlights that the Georgian Dream party’s policies have enabled increased Russian influence, underscoring Russia’s broader strategy to maintain dominance in the region by exploiting political divisions, economic dependencies, and information warfare.
External References:
-
Russia is increasing its influence in Georgia and Armenia
-
Subversion and Electoral Interference: Russia and Armenia’s 2026 Elections
Disclaimer
The Global Influence Operations Report (GIOR) employs AI throughout the posting process, including generating summaries of news items, the introduction, key points, and often the “context” section. We recommend verifying all information before use. Additionally, images are AI-generated and intended solely for illustrative purposes. While they represent the events or individuals discussed, they should not be interpreted as real-world photography.