The influence of Russian Telegram channels on operations in Romania reached alarming levels ahead of the recent presidential vote. On May 1, 2025, Balkan Insight reported that a quarter of Romanian-language Telegram channels are consistently disseminating pro-Kremlin propaganda, according to new research by analysis company OpenMinds that examined disinformation targeting Romania’s presidential election rerun. The article begins:
A new report by analysis company OpenMinds ahead of the Romanian presidential election rerun on Sunday claims that 48 of 202 Romanian-language Telegram channels consistently promote Russian propaganda. The election comes amid concerns about foreign meddling, particularly from Russian-backed entities allegedly using social media to manipulate public opinion in Romania on behalf of the far-right. The report, entitled ‘End of Democracy: How Pro-Russian Telegram Channels Influence Romanian Elections’, says that the channels have been active since early 2022, reposting content from Russian state-sponsored media outlets such as RT and Sputnik, as well as messages from the Russian Embassy in Romania and pro-Kremlin bloggers.
Key Points
- OpenMinds documented over 4,000 unique reposts from Russian sources across these channels, averaging 103 propaganda messages per month.
- Far-right candidate George Simion receives favorable coverage despite his stated NATO support, suggesting sophisticated targeting of nationalist sentiment.
- The original December 2024 election was annulled after pro-Russian candidate Calin Georgescu led the first round amid foreign interference allegations.
- Telegram’s less strict moderation rules make it an ideal platform for radical groups banned from mainstream social media despite lower overall usage in Romania.
George Simion is the leader of the Alliance for the Union of Romanians (AUR), a Romanian national conservative political party founded in 2019, rapidly rising to prominence with a platform built on four core pillars: family, nation, Christian faith, and liberty
How Telegram Amplifies Kremlin Operations and Disinformation
Telegram has become a core platform for pro-Russian influence operations, with Kremlin-aligned channels consistently outperforming opposition voices and propaganda surging on German Telegram channels. The spread of antisemitic conspiracy theories to justify Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and the operation of “fact-checking” channels as disinformation sources underscore Telegram’s role as a propaganda amplifier. Russian state media like Sputnik and RT have expanded to Telegram, leveraging the platform’s technical features-including minimal moderation and large, anonymous group chats-to bypass restrictions and reach global audiences.
The emergence of bot farms poisoning AI systems with election propaganda further demonstrates the evolving sophistication of Russian operations on Telegram. These dynamics are reinforced by the platform’s popularity among extremist communities, as research has mapped how Telegram facilitates the organization and spread of radical discourse, particularly among groups like the Russian Imperial Movement. Telegram’s controversial status is heightened by its loose content moderation, which enables the proliferation of disinformation, conspiracy theories, and criminal activity, while its lack of true end-to-end encryption and opaque server infrastructure raise ongoing concerns about privacy and security. The platform’s resilience against censorship and capacity for anonymous mass communication have made it a favored tool for both state-linked actors and transnational influence networks.
External References:
-
Disinformation on Telegram: Research and content moderation policies
-
Conspiracy, fake news, crime: Why is Telegram controversial?
Disclaimer
The Global Influence Operations Report (GIOR) employs AI throughout the posting process, including generating summaries of news items, the introduction, key points, and often the “context” section. We recommend verifying all information before use. Additionally, images are AI-generated and intended solely for illustrative purposes. While they represent the events or individuals discussed, they should not be interpreted as real-world photography.